Showing posts with label courses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label courses. Show all posts

Tuesday, 8 May 2012

PHYL 421?

This is a heads up for anyone who's planning to go into the Physiology program. This does not apply to my year, but it applies for all students who will graduate from the program after me.


PHYL 421 is a new course with the following description

PHYL 421 Advanced Cellular and Molecular Physiology 

Recent advancements in cellular and molecular physiology that have revolutionized our understanding of cell function in health and disease. 

This course is not eligible for Credit/D/Fail grading.

Credits: 3 

Pre-reqs: All of ANAT 390PHYL 301. (and third-year standing.)

    • This course is restricted to students in year: >=3

Of course, this means that students will, from now on, have to take ANAT 390 and PHYL 421. As a result, students will have 12 elective credits in year three, and 3 elective credits in year 4. The Physiology student's courseload has, in effect, been made heavier, and future physiology students will come out of the program with a better understanding of cellular physiology.


For current third year students, the faculty have agreed to waive the ANAT 390 prerequisite. This will not be so for future students. The course sounds exceedingly interesting, but it threatens to make me ridiculously busy next year. What does this mean for students taking a Physics minor?


It should still be possible to do, but this will definitely make it more difficult. I could have fit ANAT 390 into my third year courses. I would have been forced to drop MATH 300 (which I did very well in, so thankfully this was not the case), which was one of my elective courses. Fourth year is tight as it is, and this change means you  may want to save no more than one minor requirement for fourth year (unless you're planning to take an extra term).

As for me, I'm on the fence. The course sounds fascinating and useful, and fourth year physiology courses tend to have relatively high class averages. I have a feeling, however, that I will opt out of this one. I am already forced to take PHYS 301 in conflict with PHYL 430, and I don't think it would be wise to take another 36 credit year.

Thursday, 1 September 2011

MATH 223 - Course Review


MATH 223 Linear Algebra

Matrices, eigenvectors, diagonalization, orthogonality, linear systems, applications. Intended for Honours students.
Credits: 3.  Pre-reqs: Either (a) MATH 121 or (b) a score of 68% or higher in one of MATH 101MATH 103MATH 105SCIE 001


My first task on the Wednesday which marked the start of my classes was to locate the small and aged mathematics building on campus under a blanket of rainy weather.  This is nothing new to a seasoned UBC student, but I was heading to my very first class.

This is my personal addition to the reams that have been said regarding the intimidation of approaching University classes for the first time.  I had a sneaking suspicion that MATH 223 was not going to be easy, and I was not sure I had even close to enough background to handle it.

I'll get some details out of the way.  I attended University Hill Secondary School from 2004 to 2009, a school known by many as one of the consistently highest academically rated public schools in the lower mainland.  My study focus was primarily in the sciences.

I took an accelerated science course in 8th grade, which covered 9th grade material as well, and took Science 10 in my 9th grade.  I then took our school's AP version of Chemistry, Physics, and Biology courses, as well as Math 12 in the following years, and AP Calculus BC at Kerrisdale academy.  I received 4's and 5's on AP exams in Chemistry, Physics B and C (mechanics), Biology, and Calculus BC.  In my 12th grade, I shifted my focus slightly and took many humanities courses.

Long story short, I entered UBC with transfer credit for MATH 100, 101; CHEM 121; PHYS 100, 107, 3 additional credits; BIOL 121, 140, 7 additional credits.  

I had no idea how MATH 223 would pan out, considering I had not taken any University courses in mathematics.  The day before the first class, I read through some basic matrix algebra concepts including matrix addition, subtraction, multiplication, and determinants.  As a result, the first class was relatively comfortable, touching on these concepts and using them to determine the properties of inverse matrices.

Professor Anstee was extremely welcoming and friendly, displaying expertise, wit, and warmness.  I was surprised that he gave us his home phone number rather than his office number.  My impression was that he was quite dedicated to his role as a teacher and cared about his students' learning.

He said something on the first class which both unnerved and excited me.  He looked through the class list, checking on the specialities of the students.  There were students from mathematics, physics, and computer science, all expected.  He appeared slightly confused, however, at the number of students from other fields, and advised that most of us were likely in the wrong course. I smiled, driven by the same academically masochistic drive that led me to take AP courses in high school.

But MATH 223 was like no course I had thus far experienced.  The proofs started at the second class.  I realized quickly that this would be a course in which I desperately copy down chalk markings during lectures in hopes that I might have time later on to actually understand them.

Weekly assignments were difficult.  I cannot put it any way but frankly.  The majority of questions were proofs, which took anywhere between 10 minutes and one hour each.  Assignments were made up of anywhere between 8 and 12 questions, some with multiple parts.  I would often get stuck on questions for long stretches of time.  I would take breaks, ask friends for their thoughts, and come back to the questions after some time, burning up pages and pages of blank paper scribbling every approach I could come up with.

Exams were similarly difficult, but definitely fair.  Professor Anstee was careful to give us exams which were hard to ace, but easy to pass.  60% of every exam would be based on basic algorithmic concepts, and usually required little cleverness (gaussian elimination, the determinant, inverse matrices, Gram-Schmidt process etc.).  The remaining 40% would usually be made up of four 10% questions of increasing difficulty.  These would usually be based on smaller concepts derived in proofs in class, and some were proofs themselves.  Often only 1 or 2 students in the class would get any points at all on the final question of the exam.

My conclusion, the hardest part of this course was the homework.  I spent from 5-10 hours on homework weekly for this course alone (why this course is worth only 3 credits, I have no clue).  Exams were not easy, but doable, and if I had studied more, I imagine I could actually have done well.  Unless you're very confident in your abilities, don't expect to get over 90% in this class, but I think with solid effort devoted to studying for exams, the 80's are attainable.

One last point up for debate is whether this course is better as a base in linear algebra than 221.  After the fact, I barely remembered any but the most key concepts in this course.  I feel that material raced by so rapidly that I had no time to grasp much of the conceptual framework with confidence.  However, where this course was useful was that it challenged me to think at a level of mathematical abstraction that I had never even knew I could.  The homework beat into me a new-found confidence for approaching problems of a mathematical nature, and this, I feel, has helped me immensely in subsequent courses.

Tuesday, 30 August 2011

Who am I, and why am I here?

This is not a metaphysical quest, merely an introduction.  My name is Eric, and I am an undergraduate student at the University of British Columbia, located in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.  I am currently working on an Honours degree in Physiology.

The number of Physiology students at UBC is already quite limited, but what makes me academically different is that I am completing a minor in Physics and Astronomy.  The spectrum of courses I am taking therefore encompasses life science courses as well as math, physics, and astronomy.

I am here (on blogger) because I believe that a personal perspective on one's experience in University can often be an incredibly helpful and thought-provoking tool for others considering their academic paths.  Of course, this is just a thought.  If such a result ensues, I would be deeply thankful that my experiences might help guide or encourage others towards their proper callings.

My specific motivation, however, lies in the fact that, although my choice in program may be unusual, it is likely far from unique.  The next physiology student (or any life science student for that matter) who decides to minor in physics (or any mathematical, analytical, or physical science field) might find use in these pages.

The structure of this blog will be fairly loose, but posts are likely to fall into a number of categories.


Course evaluations

I tend to give detailed online evaluations at the ends of terms.  However, it is disheartening to think that those words cannot reach students deciding which courses to take.  In these posts, I will share my experience with specific courses.  It is likely that these will make up the bulk of my early posts, as I blast through all my first and second year courses.

Note that I will not be making specific reference to my impressions of instructors.  This is partly because I will make little effort to conceal my identity, but mainly because this information is likely to grow out of date as courses inevitably switch instructors over time.  I will, however, make very brief reference to instructors if their teaching style or specific teaching methods significantly impacted my experience in a course, or if I believe that the instructor warrants an extremely high level of applause for their ability.  For all other evaluations of instructors, ratemyprofs is generally decent as long as one keeps in mind its inherent biases.

Courses for which evaluations can be expected are...

Relatively soon:

  • MATH 200, 223, 215.
  • ENGL 112, 120.
  • PHIL 230a, 433.
  • PHYS 108, 200.
  • BIOL 112, 200, 201, 205, 234.
  • CHEM 123, 205, 211, 233, 235.
  • STAT 241.
  • MICB 202.
  • MUSC 167.

After term 1 this year:

  • PHYS 404.
  • ASTR 303.
  • MATH 300, 317.

After term 2 this year:

  • PHYL 301, 303. 
  • BIOC 301, 302. 
  • PHYS 304.
  • MATH 316.
  • ANTH 227.

After next year (tentative):

  • PHYL 422, 423, 424, 426, 430, 449.
  • PHYS 301 (or 305, but not both).
  • One other physics or astronomy course (likely ASTR 403).

Study tips

I am continually discovering more effective study methods.  At some point, I'll share insight on my most significant study strategies from the last couple of years.  Additionally, I'll post study tips as they come to mind, or as I learn them from others.

Due to my interest in study methods, this year I am taking part in SPAC (Science Peer Academic Coaches), and my first big study tip is to check out their website http://science.ubc.ca/students/spac.  I highly recommend checking it out.

General experience/day to day life

This is, after all, a blog.  Plenty of exciting stuff happens at UBC all the time, and when something really exciting happens, I'll write about it here if I have time.


In general, I'll try to remember to declare what "type" of post each post is.

Well, I essentially just wrote up a course outline.  Perhaps just writing in this blog would have made all of this self explanatory, but whatever.  In a way, this was as much for me as for you, which hopefully means my subsequent posts will be all the more organized and helpful to whoever might wish to read.

For now, cheers, and adios fellow UBCites.  Enjoy the last week of summer before Imagine day!

Z

P.S. For more information about me and who I am, see http://www.eyzhao.com/.